Bray Park Weir Tidal Protection Project

Share Bray Park Weir Tidal Protection Project on Facebook Share Bray Park Weir Tidal Protection Project on Twitter Share Bray Park Weir Tidal Protection Project on Linkedin Email Bray Park Weir Tidal Protection Project link

October 2024 project update

Council is progressing with vital work to secure our community’s tap water supply by investigating 2 long-term solutions that would prevent saltwater from overtopping the Bray Park Weir.

After thorough assessments by independent experts, the 2 options under investigation are to raise the weir by 800 mm and by 1300 mm.

This project is critical to protect the Tweed’s tap water supply from saltwater contamination and ensuring long-term sustainability in the face of rising sea levels.

From 1 January 2017 until 2 October 2024, there have been 90 overtopping tidal events, with 66 requiring blocks to be deployed for a total of 570 days to prevent saltwater from entering the weir pool.

We are now seeking the feedback of landowners who potentially could be impacted by raising the weir.

Where we are now

  • Investigations completed: Independent consultants GHD have conducted detailed studies on both options. This includes an options assessment, an environmental impact assessment involving flood studies and detailed design concepts.
  • Next steps: We are now at the stage where stakeholder input is essential before a final recommendation is made to the elected Council for its consideration. The elected Council would then determine the next steps.

How we got here

  • Previous investigations: Council formed a project reference group in 2017 to identify and assess options to reduce the risk of saltwater contamination of the Tweed water supply. The group identified a range of options including:
    • a hinged barrier across the entire weir
    • continued use of concrete blocks
    • narrowing the weir
    • moving the intake of the Bray Park Water Treatment Plant
    • raising the weir.

After the group recommended a hinged barrier, consultants engaged by Council conducted a detailed investigation, which found this option unworkable. The group ranked other options, including narrowing the weir and raising the weir. An investigation by consultants into narrowing the weir determined this option unviable because it would provide limited protection to the water supply. The continued use of concrete blocks doesn’t provide adequate protection against overtopping events and the manual installation and removal of the blocks is unsafe. Moving the intake of the treatment plant upstream would significantly reduce the catchment area of the Tweed district water supply, decreasing the amount of water available for most of the Tweed.


Learn more

We have compiled key information to help you better understand the 2 options and the potential impacts. Please take a look at these resources.

> Bray Park Weir Raising Assessment

The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the investigations of the hydraulic impacts of raising the weir by 800 mm and by 1300 mm.

> Bray Park Weir Raising Assessment - Appendices (Flood Mapping and Fishway Layout Options)

Flood mapping, presenting the results of the flooding assessment for each scenario, is provided in Appendix A. A concept fishway layout has been developed for the 2 raising scenarios and included in Appendix B.

> Bray Park Weir Concept Design

This report aims to:

  • document the data provided by Council and other sources that would be used to develop the concept design
  • review relevance of the data in its ability to inform the design process
  • undertake an assessment of what data was not provided and its impacts on the design process
  • provide a summary of the basis of design for the weir and fishway to set the guiding criteria for the project moving forward.

> Bray Park Weir Concept Design Report

This report aims to document the:

  • assessment of options to raise or narrow the weir
  • outcomes of the preliminary desktop assessment to review 3 permanent weir raising options
  • structural and geotechnical impacts of these works on the existing structure and its foundations.

> Bray Park Weir Review of Gate Options

This document provides a summary of information on hinged barrier options presented to Council. It summarises GHD’s opinions on the various technologies and provides scoring based on qualitative assessment of the options.



Ask us a question

Do you have any questions about the project or the options under consideration? We’re here to help. Use the form below to ask a question, and we will respond as soon as possible.

Ask a question


Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

We’ve compiled a list of frequently asked questions to help address the most common queries about the project, its impacts and what the next steps are. You can access them on this webpage.

Q1: Why is Council looking at raising the weir?

The weir is under increasing risk of saltwater overtopping due to rising sea levels. This could jeopardise the supply of tap water for most of the Tweed. Raising the weir would safeguard this essential water source for years to come.

Q2: How often is the weir being overtopped by saltwater and blocks deployed?

From 1 January 2017 to 2 October 2024, there have been 90 overtopping tidal events, with 66 requiring blocks to be deployed for 570 days to prevent saltwater entering the weir pool. This has become a problematic risk to manage. Overtopping events have been occurring more frequently and on occasions twice a month. The frequency of events is well in excess of that predicted by the Water Research Laboratory.

In the past year, the fishway has been blocked for 158 days to prevent saltwater from contaminating the Tweed District water supply. Any mitigation measure to prevent the saltwater contamination will need to consider fish passage.

Q3: What are the differences between raising the weir by 800 mm and by 1300 mm?

Raising the weir by 800 mm would protect our water supply from saltwater contamination until around 2050, while raising it by 1300 mm would extend protection until 2100. More details are available in the information sheet and the detailed options assessment.

Q4: Would raising the weir increase flood risks upstream?

There would be increases in water levels during floods immediately upstream of the weir. However, further upstream the increase would be minimal. For example, at Byangum Bridge, the increase would be about 10 mm during large floods. More details can be found in the options assessment.

Q5: Can’t we continue to rely on weir blocks?

Since 2017, our workers have been managing overtopping events by manually installing concrete blocks to narrow or block the weir. The blocks are removed when the risk has passed. While the blocks reduce the risk of saltwater contamination, they don’t fully mitigate the risk and the manual installation and removal is a safety concern. The fish ladder in the weir must also be blocked in these events, impacting the movement of fish in the river.

Read more FAQs


Have your say

We are encouraging landowners who could be impacted by the 2 weir-raising options to share their thoughts with Council by 4 pm on Friday 22 November 2024.

All feedback will be considered before further decisions are made.

Advice on how to provide feedback has been posted to all potentially impacted landowners.

We thank the landowners for taking the time to have their say and helping us secure the future of Tweed tap water.


Sign up for email alerts when Council deploys blocks

To receive email alerts when we deploy blocks on the weir for temporary protection, please email wateradmin@tweed.nsw.gov.au (subject: ‘Weir Alert’).

We provide at least 3 hours’ notice of deployment.

October 2024 project update

Council is progressing with vital work to secure our community’s tap water supply by investigating 2 long-term solutions that would prevent saltwater from overtopping the Bray Park Weir.

After thorough assessments by independent experts, the 2 options under investigation are to raise the weir by 800 mm and by 1300 mm.

This project is critical to protect the Tweed’s tap water supply from saltwater contamination and ensuring long-term sustainability in the face of rising sea levels.

From 1 January 2017 until 2 October 2024, there have been 90 overtopping tidal events, with 66 requiring blocks to be deployed for a total of 570 days to prevent saltwater from entering the weir pool.

We are now seeking the feedback of landowners who potentially could be impacted by raising the weir.

Where we are now

  • Investigations completed: Independent consultants GHD have conducted detailed studies on both options. This includes an options assessment, an environmental impact assessment involving flood studies and detailed design concepts.
  • Next steps: We are now at the stage where stakeholder input is essential before a final recommendation is made to the elected Council for its consideration. The elected Council would then determine the next steps.

How we got here

  • Previous investigations: Council formed a project reference group in 2017 to identify and assess options to reduce the risk of saltwater contamination of the Tweed water supply. The group identified a range of options including:
    • a hinged barrier across the entire weir
    • continued use of concrete blocks
    • narrowing the weir
    • moving the intake of the Bray Park Water Treatment Plant
    • raising the weir.

After the group recommended a hinged barrier, consultants engaged by Council conducted a detailed investigation, which found this option unworkable. The group ranked other options, including narrowing the weir and raising the weir. An investigation by consultants into narrowing the weir determined this option unviable because it would provide limited protection to the water supply. The continued use of concrete blocks doesn’t provide adequate protection against overtopping events and the manual installation and removal of the blocks is unsafe. Moving the intake of the treatment plant upstream would significantly reduce the catchment area of the Tweed district water supply, decreasing the amount of water available for most of the Tweed.


Learn more

We have compiled key information to help you better understand the 2 options and the potential impacts. Please take a look at these resources.

> Bray Park Weir Raising Assessment

The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the investigations of the hydraulic impacts of raising the weir by 800 mm and by 1300 mm.

> Bray Park Weir Raising Assessment - Appendices (Flood Mapping and Fishway Layout Options)

Flood mapping, presenting the results of the flooding assessment for each scenario, is provided in Appendix A. A concept fishway layout has been developed for the 2 raising scenarios and included in Appendix B.

> Bray Park Weir Concept Design

This report aims to:

  • document the data provided by Council and other sources that would be used to develop the concept design
  • review relevance of the data in its ability to inform the design process
  • undertake an assessment of what data was not provided and its impacts on the design process
  • provide a summary of the basis of design for the weir and fishway to set the guiding criteria for the project moving forward.

> Bray Park Weir Concept Design Report

This report aims to document the:

  • assessment of options to raise or narrow the weir
  • outcomes of the preliminary desktop assessment to review 3 permanent weir raising options
  • structural and geotechnical impacts of these works on the existing structure and its foundations.

> Bray Park Weir Review of Gate Options

This document provides a summary of information on hinged barrier options presented to Council. It summarises GHD’s opinions on the various technologies and provides scoring based on qualitative assessment of the options.



Ask us a question

Do you have any questions about the project or the options under consideration? We’re here to help. Use the form below to ask a question, and we will respond as soon as possible.

Ask a question


Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

We’ve compiled a list of frequently asked questions to help address the most common queries about the project, its impacts and what the next steps are. You can access them on this webpage.

Q1: Why is Council looking at raising the weir?

The weir is under increasing risk of saltwater overtopping due to rising sea levels. This could jeopardise the supply of tap water for most of the Tweed. Raising the weir would safeguard this essential water source for years to come.

Q2: How often is the weir being overtopped by saltwater and blocks deployed?

From 1 January 2017 to 2 October 2024, there have been 90 overtopping tidal events, with 66 requiring blocks to be deployed for 570 days to prevent saltwater entering the weir pool. This has become a problematic risk to manage. Overtopping events have been occurring more frequently and on occasions twice a month. The frequency of events is well in excess of that predicted by the Water Research Laboratory.

In the past year, the fishway has been blocked for 158 days to prevent saltwater from contaminating the Tweed District water supply. Any mitigation measure to prevent the saltwater contamination will need to consider fish passage.

Q3: What are the differences between raising the weir by 800 mm and by 1300 mm?

Raising the weir by 800 mm would protect our water supply from saltwater contamination until around 2050, while raising it by 1300 mm would extend protection until 2100. More details are available in the information sheet and the detailed options assessment.

Q4: Would raising the weir increase flood risks upstream?

There would be increases in water levels during floods immediately upstream of the weir. However, further upstream the increase would be minimal. For example, at Byangum Bridge, the increase would be about 10 mm during large floods. More details can be found in the options assessment.

Q5: Can’t we continue to rely on weir blocks?

Since 2017, our workers have been managing overtopping events by manually installing concrete blocks to narrow or block the weir. The blocks are removed when the risk has passed. While the blocks reduce the risk of saltwater contamination, they don’t fully mitigate the risk and the manual installation and removal is a safety concern. The fish ladder in the weir must also be blocked in these events, impacting the movement of fish in the river.

Read more FAQs


Have your say

We are encouraging landowners who could be impacted by the 2 weir-raising options to share their thoughts with Council by 4 pm on Friday 22 November 2024.

All feedback will be considered before further decisions are made.

Advice on how to provide feedback has been posted to all potentially impacted landowners.

We thank the landowners for taking the time to have their say and helping us secure the future of Tweed tap water.


Sign up for email alerts when Council deploys blocks

To receive email alerts when we deploy blocks on the weir for temporary protection, please email wateradmin@tweed.nsw.gov.au (subject: ‘Weir Alert’).

We provide at least 3 hours’ notice of deployment.

Type your question here

You need to be signed in to add your question.

  • Share Has the level water downstream of the weir ever been above the prediction plus 20%? - PRG on Facebook Share Has the level water downstream of the weir ever been above the prediction plus 20%? - PRG on Twitter Share Has the level water downstream of the weir ever been above the prediction plus 20%? - PRG on Linkedin Email Has the level water downstream of the weir ever been above the prediction plus 20%? - PRG link

    Has the level water downstream of the weir ever been above the prediction plus 20%? - PRG

    BrendaH asked about 5 years ago

    Up until June 2019, there were 25 occasions when actual levels were greater than predicted plus 20%.  Since June 2019, there has been none.

  • Share On how many occasions since our last meeting have the blocks been deployed? - PRG on Facebook Share On how many occasions since our last meeting have the blocks been deployed? - PRG on Twitter Share On how many occasions since our last meeting have the blocks been deployed? - PRG on Linkedin Email On how many occasions since our last meeting have the blocks been deployed? - PRG link

    On how many occasions since our last meeting have the blocks been deployed? - PRG

    BrendaH asked about 5 years ago

    Ten.  In some cases, blocks have been deployed to cover a number of events.

  • Share What was the maximum height of the tides during each event? - PRG on Facebook Share What was the maximum height of the tides during each event? - PRG on Twitter Share What was the maximum height of the tides during each event? - PRG on Linkedin Email What was the maximum height of the tides during each event? - PRG link

    What was the maximum height of the tides during each event? - PRG

    BrendaH asked about 5 years ago

    Maximum heights ranged from 0.91 to 1.14 AHD.  There were eight results over 1.00m AHD.

  • Share What has been the total cost of the deployments and removals of barrier since 19 Sept 2018? - PRG on Facebook Share What has been the total cost of the deployments and removals of barrier since 19 Sept 2018? - PRG on Twitter Share What has been the total cost of the deployments and removals of barrier since 19 Sept 2018? - PRG on Linkedin Email What has been the total cost of the deployments and removals of barrier since 19 Sept 2018? - PRG link

    What has been the total cost of the deployments and removals of barrier since 19 Sept 2018? - PRG

    BrendaH asked about 5 years ago

    $47,900

  • Share Has there been any improvements / variations to either methodology or investigation towards public tender? - PRG on Facebook Share Has there been any improvements / variations to either methodology or investigation towards public tender? - PRG on Twitter Share Has there been any improvements / variations to either methodology or investigation towards public tender? - PRG on Linkedin Email Has there been any improvements / variations to either methodology or investigation towards public tender? - PRG link

    Has there been any improvements / variations to either methodology or investigation towards public tender? - PRG

    BrendaH asked about 5 years ago

    Yes, there have been improvements in the methodology for the deployment of the blocks bringing the cost of each deployment down.  Council’s management has determined that the current processes are the most effective way to manage these risks while still being able to respond at short notice and make adjustments on a daily basis if and as required.

  • Share During low flow periods, can the temporary blocks be either left on the weir wall or left partially in place on the weir wall to reduce costs? - PRG on Facebook Share During low flow periods, can the temporary blocks be either left on the weir wall or left partially in place on the weir wall to reduce costs? - PRG on Twitter Share During low flow periods, can the temporary blocks be either left on the weir wall or left partially in place on the weir wall to reduce costs? - PRG on Linkedin Email During low flow periods, can the temporary blocks be either left on the weir wall or left partially in place on the weir wall to reduce costs? - PRG link

    During low flow periods, can the temporary blocks be either left on the weir wall or left partially in place on the weir wall to reduce costs? - PRG

    BrendaH asked about 5 years ago

    Previously concerns had been raised about artificially increasing water levels for longer than required to prevent salt water intrusion.  Council can leave the blocks out longer if upstream flows do not necessitate their removal.  Any decision to leave the blocks out (prior to the implementation of a permanent solution) needs to consider issues such as aquatic weeds, fish ladder flows and minimising releases from Clarrie Hall Dam.

  • Share What is the present raw water salinity? on Facebook Share What is the present raw water salinity? on Twitter Share What is the present raw water salinity? on Linkedin Email What is the present raw water salinity? link

    What is the present raw water salinity?

    BrendaH asked about 5 years ago

    Results from 1 Jan 2018 – 8 Sept 2019 were: 

    Median conductivity – 182.0 us/cm2

    Mean conductivity – 182.3 us/cm2

    Standard Deviation – 29.4 us/cm2.

    5%ile on single tailed standard distribution = mean + 1.65 sd

    182.3 + 1.65*29.4 = 230.8 us/cm2

    230.8 us/cm2   = 152.3 mg/L

    1%ile on single tailed standard distribution = mean + 2.33 sd

    182.3 + 2.33*29.4 = 250.8 us/cm2

    251.5 us/cm2  = 165.5 mg/L


  • Share Has Council investigated the PRG proposal to enable the most efficient and cost effective method of installing the current temporary barriers, ie via a tender process or contract, until a longer term solution /s are determined? on Facebook Share Has Council investigated the PRG proposal to enable the most efficient and cost effective method of installing the current temporary barriers, ie via a tender process or contract, until a longer term solution /s are determined? on Twitter Share Has Council investigated the PRG proposal to enable the most efficient and cost effective method of installing the current temporary barriers, ie via a tender process or contract, until a longer term solution /s are determined? on Linkedin Email Has Council investigated the PRG proposal to enable the most efficient and cost effective method of installing the current temporary barriers, ie via a tender process or contract, until a longer term solution /s are determined? link

    Has Council investigated the PRG proposal to enable the most efficient and cost effective method of installing the current temporary barriers, ie via a tender process or contract, until a longer term solution /s are determined?

    BrendaH asked over 5 years ago

    As Council gains more experience it will continue to assess the viability of alternate methods of deploying the temporary barriers, such as going out to tender. 


  • Share Does the fish ladder remain closed for the duration of the period the blocks are installed, including low tides ? on Facebook Share Does the fish ladder remain closed for the duration of the period the blocks are installed, including low tides ? on Twitter Share Does the fish ladder remain closed for the duration of the period the blocks are installed, including low tides ? on Linkedin Email Does the fish ladder remain closed for the duration of the period the blocks are installed, including low tides ? link

    Does the fish ladder remain closed for the duration of the period the blocks are installed, including low tides ?

    BrendaH asked over 5 years ago

    Yes. When blocks are deployed, there are limited windows of opportunity where there would be appropriate flow through the fish ladder to allow fish passage. Because the fish ladder is opened and closed manually, to access every fish passage opportunity would require staff to be on call at all hours. This is neither practical nor cost effective.


  • Share For what period has NSW Fisheries and the relevant Water authorities approved the closure of the fish ladder? on Facebook Share For what period has NSW Fisheries and the relevant Water authorities approved the closure of the fish ladder? on Twitter Share For what period has NSW Fisheries and the relevant Water authorities approved the closure of the fish ladder? on Linkedin Email For what period has NSW Fisheries and the relevant Water authorities approved the closure of the fish ladder? link

    For what period has NSW Fisheries and the relevant Water authorities approved the closure of the fish ladder?

    BrendaH asked over 5 years ago

    The relevant authorities are aware of Council’s present practice with the deployment of blocks and closing and opening the fish ladder.  Council has sought advice from those authorities as to what approvals are required.  At this time, Council has not been advised of any approvals required.  Those authorities have indicated they will address the matter of the fish ladder when Council has determined a way forward.


Page published: 22 Oct 2024, 09:13 AM